I normally blog about subjects for which I possess a secure appreciation or alternatively report and riff on someone else’s research and analysis. Here, I venture into a subject outside my expertise and am happy to be corrected.
The term adaptive landscape is used by DarkHorse podcasters Heather Heying and Bret Weinstein in their book A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century (2021), as yet unread by me with no plans to pick it up. As I understand it, an adaptive landscape operates in both biological and cultural paradigms and at accordingly different timescales. The idea is profound as it relates to developments and influences in human and nonhuman environments (a/k/a survival pressures) that demand behavioral adaptation. In biology, adaptation may lead to speciation. However, most long-lived, complex organisms don’t evolve nearly a rapidly as, say, viruses and insects, so that effect manifesting over evolutionary time falls out of scope for most discussions not restricted to evolution. Adaptive responses may thus be better understood as functioning in the cultural realm.
Organisms exist within biological niches that require individualized responses to their particular adaptive landscape. Even with highly social species such as ants and apes (admittedly broad categories), one should expect them to differ somewhat from place to place and time to time. So not all frogs, bears, birds, and bees behave or have always behaved the same ways. I expect much higher incidence of behavioral overlap in nonhuman species, however, than with humans precisely because human culture is demonstrably far more robust and varied. Don’t know with certainty, but my suspicion is that most species respond directly to survival pressure (nature red in tooth and claw) because they exist in a state of nature whereas humans live for the most part within civilization and so add a high quotient of cultural adaption and optimization well below life-and-death stakes. Yet humans face ongoing existential threats (including nuclear annihilation) like any other species, which often fail to register and/or be a spur to action.
Bringing this post around to one of the overarching themes of this blog, let me suggest that an inability to fully recognize and respond to looming collapse and likely near-term human extinction is due in part to mismatch between timescales, e.g., a human lifetime, human history, evolutionary time, and geological time, with cosmological time falling even further out of consideration. Another way of putting this appears in an article by Laura Hudson in Wired about philosopher Timothy Morton, who coined the term hyperobject to describe “phenomena that are too vast and fundamentally weird for humans to wrap their heads around.” I’ve wrestled with examples of the term ranging from deep time, oceanic garbage gyres, the irrationality and gamification of financial markets, rampant political dysfunction and institutional corruption, the Counter-Enlightenment, Transhumanism, the climate emergency, the metacrisis or polycrisis associated with the inability to make sense of reality when so much is purposely falsified in the information environment, and of course, the collapse of industrial civilization. For reasons unclear, I’m drawn to contemplation of issues that necessitate a god’s eye view (perhaps another way of grokking hyperobjects, see here and here), though I have neither the time, patience, nor inclination to systematize my thinking the way Daniel Schmachtenberg (and others) do with The Consilience Project, which I find an increasingly pointless bureaucratic response as planetary conditions worsen.
What I recognize is that, despite best attempts to address mounting existential threats (often in the form of hyperobjects) that inform the adaptive landscape, humans are not up to the task and cannot escape the energetic puzzle box we unwittingly trapped ourselves inside with the adoption of fossil fuels two to three centuries ago and subsequent build-out of the modern world. The human adaptive landscape is simply not powerful or widespread enough to produce the signal needed to fight effectively for survival. Instead, we feign concern, freeze in paralysis/denial of the immensity of such dark portents, and take flight from reality but cannot ultimately avoid failing.