I’ve been an avid reader for years of James Howard Kunstler’s Monthly Eyesore tab on his website, now part of his Substack. Kunstler first came to my attention because of his 2005 book The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-first Century (didn’t read it, but I understood it was principally about the moribund concept of peak oil and secondarily about the giant overextension of industrial civilization in the fossil fuel era). His 1994 book The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise And Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape (also not read) established his authority with regard to architectural design and criticism, noting that the buildout of the suburbs (U.S. cities, and one supposes, those abroad) following white flight from city centers was the “greatest misallocation of funds” in the history of mankind. That contention might be arguable in light of money directed to creating our own replacements much as peak oil hasn’t manifested on schedule as expected.
CNN (online) ran a techno-narcisist-optimist feature timed for release on the first day of 2026 to run down a list of “projects set to shape the world.” That’s a charitable framing considering the crisis of affordability in housing shaping the world right now — something far more important to priced-out demographic segments than flamboyant architecture. The Olympic Village in Milan, Italy, created to house athletes, is intended to be transformed into student housing after the 2026 Winter Olympics is over, but I would not be surprised if that plan is quietly altered late in the game. None of the other projects is even remotely related to housing except for one ultrarich project in NYC. The rest are grand, eye-catching prestige projects (not including the Obama Presidential Bunker Library, which looks like an oversized pillbox). Which are necessary and which are essentially masturbatory is debatable.
In a former era, it was far easier to be innocently gobsmacked with admiration for super-scale architectural prowess (spires and towers, supertall buildings, stadia, etc.) even though ancient megalithic structures easily put modern construction to shame. Infrastructure projects (primarily transit hubs such as airports and train lines and stations) possess less glamor but greater functionality while serving regular people. Searching online for construction projects in Chicago reveals developments and renovations proceeding in fits and starts, largely due to troublesome financing. For instance, multiple sites are being proposed for new stadia for both the Chicago Bears and the Chicago White Sox even though their current homes are perfectly serviceable, not decrepit. Gotta keep up with other cities, I guess. Work has already begun to refurbish the disastrous Thompson Center and nearby State & Lake “L” Station, both of which have handsome artist’s rendering that probably oversell their appeal. Nice to see that housing is mixed into new Chicago projects, though those garnering the most attention are megaprojects such as 400 Lake Shore Drive (reusing the site of the failed Fordham/Chicago Spire project — nothing approaching affordable there). In fairness, undue attention does not accrue to small projects like single-family homes or condo buildings of four storeys or fewer. Planning for and building a livable future (at smaller scale) vs. living large amongst multibillion-dollar projects is a difficult balance to strike given the developer impulse to go big while that possibility persists for a while longer.
